From such a foundation stone of knowledge, Descartes could then build up a picture of what else could be known for certain.ĭescartes called into question a posteriori knowledge or ‘ adventitious ideas’ knowledge acquired from outside experiences and through sensory perception. He aimed to find room for doubt in what he believed to know that which could not be doubted and was certain – would be the ‘foundation of knowledge’. He wished to ‘demolish everything and start right from the foundation’. However Descartes’ aim in doubting was to find something he could be certain of. This was a similar method to that used by the Sceptics of Ancient Greece who argued that one could never be certain of anything. Ayer regarding the statement ‘ I think therefore I am’ – and why, despite Ayer’s objection Descartes’ claim can convincingly be argued to be the foundation of knowledge.ĭescartes wanted to know what he could know for certain, that which was ‘stable and likely to last’. He noted that much he had supposed to be true, was, in fact, false therefore, in order to find the foundation of knowledge, Descartes used the ‘method of doubt’ to call all that he had previously believed into question. In this article I will examine how and why Descartes reached this conclusion, consider the objection raised by A. He arrived at the conclusion that, if one is conscious of their own thoughts, their existence is an undeniable ‘clear and distinct’ truth. If one thinks, they cannot doubt their existence. René Descartes wrote his meditations with the aim of finding out what he knew for sure this certain truth would be the foundation of knowledge. If you find this argument convincing, stick around for a future article where I will argue for what I call the logical uncertainty principle, claiming that everything has a degree of uncertainty, even Descartes’s cogito argument.Click here to see a defence of Ayer’s critique of Descartes by Andy Bennett. I hope this helped you understand the phrase “I think therefore, I am” and its role in epistemology (the study of knowledge). Historians often view this as a turning point in the history of philosophy, marking the beginning of the modern philosophy period. ![]() (Second Meditation, Meditation on First Philosophy)Įvery time you attempt to doubt your own existence as a thinking thing, you thereby affirm it, by thinking! Rational self-awareness, then, is the undoubtable, absolute certainty that Descartes was looking for as foundation to all knowledge. At last I have discovered it - thought! This is the one thing that can’t be separated from me. “Now that I have convinced myself that there is nothing in the world - no sky, no earth, no minds, no bodies - does it follow that I don’t exist either? No it does not follow for if I convinced myself of something then I certainly existed. ![]() Do you even have a physical body? Perhaps you are actually a brain in a vat hooked up to electrodes simulating your current experience.Īccording to René Descartes, one thing that you cannot doubt is your own existence as a thinking thing. How’s that going for you? You can doubt many aspects of yourself, such as, are you a good person? Are you even human? Perhaps you are actually an alien octopus creature dreaming. Go ahead, try it doubt your own existence entirely. It is perhaps better summarized as “I doubt, so I think therefore, I am.” “I think therefore, I am” is a truncated version of this argument. Therefore, I exist, at the very least as a thinking thing.If I attempt to doubt my own existence, then I am thinking.Descartes found that although he could doubt many things about himself, one thing that he could not doubt, is that he exists. After doubting everything in the external world, Descartes turns to attempting to doubt his internal word, that of his own mind. This is where the cogito argument enters, to save the day. Although unlikely, it’s at least possible that we are in a cosmic dream or being deceived by a powerful demon, and so we cannot know with absolute certainty that the world around us actually exists. ![]() Through methodic doubt, Descartes determined that almost everything could be doubted. The 17th century philosopher René Descartes wanted to find an absolute, undoubtable truth in order to build a system of knowledge on a solid foundation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |